Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Software is the "soul" of a computer, that is...

I've come to realize that we are not the "sum of our parts".  Its a fairly big revelation for me, because I've held to that idea since first officially calling myself an atheist.  As I've come to understand the concept of what thought is, what memory is, in the context of my programming career, its become increasingly clear that our "sense of self" is not literally brain tissue or neurons, it is further abstracted to the communication between the neurons.  This is analgous to the idea that a mathematical forumla is not literally composed of graphite scrapings on a piece of paper, and if you remove Microsoft Windows from a computer, it doesnt "weigh any less".  A full hard disk weighs exactly as much as an empty one.

So, in essence, what constitutes a human is not the "hardware", rather the software.  I am convinced of this, that if it were possible to slowly replace each neuron in our brain with a fully functioning but silicon based substitute that used standard electricity instead of the complex of chemicals required by our biological neurons to function, we could, quite literally, replace our "brains" with new hardware probably without noticing anything, except perhaps increased clarity of thought and significantly better memory.  We'd also stop needing to eat and breath oxygen and be able to last much longer, presumably.  The point is, each of us, our "ego", the I...would simply continue on because we are the software, not the hardware.  You can replace an organ, an arm, an eye, a leg.  We remain.

Ergo, if we are just software contained inside a relatively complex machine, we actually are "souls" in the sense that we are, to put it very primitively, software running on hardware just like a computer.

Continuing on that thread, we then, if it were technically possible, could be "downloaded" on to other hardware, say, smaller hardware that is miniaturized, or hardware that exists in a smaller paradigm such as using quarks, or if the string theorists are correct, as strings. 

That tangent leads us to realize that since we know quarks and strings do not exist as we do, in a material plane, and can pop in and out of our universe, presumably if our conciousness could be contained by these things where they were functioning as neurons do currently on the macro [sic] scale, living with "brains" spread across strings would mean we could coexist in several planes, several dimensions.  It would also mean we could simultaneously perceive across vast regions of space in several places at once, only as long as communication could occur between strings via hopping in and out of planes in a multi-dimensional space.

The short answer is, then, that the idea of God, souls, heaven, all of these universally held but as yet un observed and unproven phenomena become more possible.  Given our limited perspective, however, it is still no more likely that that Christian explaination of all things is any more accurate than the flying spaghetti monster.  A grand unification theory would explain a potential mechanism for this "spiritual software existence" to manifest itself across the universe, but until we managed to cross over by "upgrading our hardware" it would be impossible to know.

Another interesting point is speed/time.  When you dream, you can experience days, weeks, or months in the space of a few minutes during what we clumsily refer to as "REM" sleep, 5-15 minutes of real (our physical perspective) time.  To software though, time is not a constraint.  A computer can process 1 Billion calculations in 1 second or less.  Presumably our brains do something similar or much faster but in less easy to quantify ways as far as we can tell.

So, if we return to our "string" powered brains, we end up having the capability to live thousands of lifetimes in a nanosecond, and perhaps our physical 3d neighbours in universe 45Tg4b (ours), become rather like statues that take millenia just to move a finger.  Impossible or at least completely uninteresting to even try to relate to.  Have you ever tried to sit down and have a conversation with a mountain?  Its simply moved 2-3 inches and you have lived and died 900 times.  Talking to a physical person might be as boring as watching grass grow.

That said, of course, in our dreams, we escape to a world where we can experience the vastness of the universe in a blink of an eye, travel at the speed of thought , and defy our physical reality.  Perhaps our less "land locked" neighbours do communicate with us in dream, their software interfaces with ours, and they show us sights.  Who knows. If you assume our conciousness is effectively software locked in some relatively crude, large hardware (think a vaccuum tube computer the size of a warehouse compared to a digital PDA), there could be something to it.

Of course, this kind of olive branch makes one vulnerable again to the pitfalls of religion, that is, if all this is quite possible, who is to say that Joel Osteen is a quack?  That L.Ron Hubbard wasnt making up his fanciful stories of aliens?  That Joseph Smith actually did talk to Moroni and wasn't simply a moron.  It becomes thorny for certain.  Thus it is clear that we need to be vigilant in maintaining an intellectual clarity and openness to questioning everything, avoiding "sacred unquestionable knowledge" which I can still say I am an "a" to.  "Asacrist" perhaps..."adogma", "asuperstitious"...it continues.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Nationalism is Dumb.

The only thing dumber and more detrimental to earth than religious faith is "nationalism". We are not countries, we are all humans. Every human being is a "citizen of earth". We need to forget the idea of countries and relegate the notion of "immigrant" to history.

Read http://www.marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm for the way to make it a reality (the last part is where it becomes clear)

"their country...our country..." dumb. We are all earthlings. Poverty is EVERYONE's problem. Unemployment anywhere is EVERYONE's PROBLEM. Poor labor laws anywhere on earth is EVERYONE's PROBLEM.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

joaquin phoenix and the futility of celebrity

So as I watch Joaquin Phoenix make more and more of an ass of himself, and reality TV incresingly demonstrate the ridiculousness and irrelevance of celebrities...it becomes increasingly clear that celebrity status is going to the masses. Facebook, ning.com, google etc. allow each of us to decide who is a celebrity, and we are becoming more and more interested in our personal friends, and less and less interested in the "big stars", except for when they go to jail, overdose, or unexpectedly lose an article of clothing. I hope one day we can see them for what they are...regular people who act for a living, and beyond that, not particularly interesting.

(with all due respect to Mr. Phoenix, and the celebrity community of course, many of whom I count as dear friends)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Season's Greetings

"JOY TO THE WORLD, THERE IS NO GOD

LET MEN

THEIR BRAINS

EMPLOY"

Merry Holiday Seasons...remember Mythras is the reason for the season

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Quotes by some famous atheists

usually its better to let smarter people do the talking. I will heed that advice for today!

". . . imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in, an interesting hole I find myself in, fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, it's still frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for."-Douglas Adams



"In an infinite universe, aren't we an INEVITABLE eventuality?"-source unknown


"Religion convinced the world that there's an invisible man in the sky who watches everything you do. And there's 10 things he doesn't want you to do or else you'll go to a burning place with a lake of fire until the end of eternity. But he loves you ... and he needs money! He's all powerful, but he can't seem to hold on to a few bucks."-George Carlin

Labels: , , , , , ,

The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, but a wise man listens to advice.

Do you believe that that the above statement is in any way ridiculous? Is it
irrelevant? Is it a raving of any kind? Is its source guided by the phases of
the moon? Perhaps you feel that someone who thinks a wise men listening to
advice is something that should commit a person to be restrained and placed in
an institution.

If you take specific verses, sentences, or phrases, then yes, they can very well make sense if placed in a completely different context.

However, if you take the Bible as a whole, which I understand it is very seriously intended to be taken as such, the foundation is the premise that it is the inerrant word of god, dictated to man, largely through a mysterious inspiration process.

It has been argued for centuries by many scholars, not the least of which is famed Egyptologist Gerald Massey, that the bible was not the first to state the stories and quotes you are referring to and certainly not the only historical document to contain most if not all its "wisdom".

So, taken in that context, the whole context, it can be fairly stated that since god is imaginary, anyone claiming to literally "talk to god" or "receive direct instructions from god" to be a raving lunatic, or categorically insane.

My statement was terse but not invalid. There are far greater pieces of literature in existence that deserve much more consideration that this injustifiably revered work of fiction.

The primary difference between the Bible and Science is that the Bible starts with a conclusion, then attempts (pathetically IMO) to justify its position in light of readily observable evidence. Science the other hand, starts with a question and never really reaches a conclusion.

It is a constant refinement of position that gives the truth the reverence it deserves, that it is illusive and difficult to discover, perhaps even unknowable by our tiny species."

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Be Sane or Insane

There are only two world views, Insane and Sane.
Insane means you believe in and live to serve imaginary beings. You make up your own reality and reject actual reality.Sane means you accept reality and disregard imaginary things. Put them aside, dismiss them as fantasy, myth, cultural faux pas, superstition.Thats it. Be Sane, or be Insane.

Labels: , , , , , ,